Case 2200409/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Mikalciene v The Camouflage Company UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200409/2022
- Decision date
- 10 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Connolly Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Mikalciene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded the respondent's correct name as The Camouflage Company UK Limited. It then found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages for the period from 1 August 2021 to 23 November 2021, and ordered payment of £10,067.09, being the total gross sum deducted, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance.
The tribunal also held that the claimant's holiday pay claim for the 2021 holiday year was well founded. It awarded £1,104.93 for 9 days of accrued but untaken holiday for that year, again subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance.
In addition, pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,227.70, representing two weeks' gross pay, because it had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages for the period 1 August 2021 to 23 November 2021 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £10,067 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the 2021 holiday year claim well founded and awarded 9 days' accrued but untaken holiday pay, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,105 |
| Other | The tribunal awarded two weeks' gross pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,228 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,400
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.