Case 2200419/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr J Piesse, director — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200419/2024
- Decision date
- 17 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs W Ni brought claims against Fulhouse Limited for unpaid wages, unpaid commission and expenses. At the hearing on 11 September 2024, Mr J Piesse appeared for the Respondent and did not contest that the amounts claimed were due. The tribunal noted that there was no defence to the claim and that the Respondent's counterclaim was withdrawn because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to deal with it.
The tribunal held that the claim under Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded, as did the breach of contract claim. It ordered the Respondent to pay £4,800.16, made up of £3,114.58 unpaid wages, £1,170 unpaid commission and £515.58 expenses. The tribunal recorded that the wages and commission amounts were gross sums and that deductions paid to the relevant authorities for tax and national insurance would constitute a valid discharge of the judgment.
Because the Respondent had failed to provide the bundle ordered by the tribunal and the Claimant had prepared the bundle herself, the tribunal also ordered £129 for three hours' preparation time for the hearing. The tribunal referred to Rules 75 and 76 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 when making that order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the Part 2 Employment Rights Act 1996 claim for unpaid wages, commission and expenses. The monetary award was not split between this claim and the breach of contract claim; the tribunal ordered a combined payment of £4,800.16. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim on the same unpaid wages, commission and expenses. The award was made as a combined sum with the unlawful deduction claim and was not apportioned between the two. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,800
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rules 75 and 76 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.