Case 2200425/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Abdul Hakim Sofiane v London United Busways Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 2200425/2017
- Decision date
- 18 July 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Abdul Hakim Sofiane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the tribunal considered claims relating to detriments (a) to (d), as referred to in a Case Management Order dated 11 July 2017, and/or claims relating to Grievances 1 and 2, as referred to in the claimant's email dated 18 July 2017.
Employment Judge Quill, sitting alone, dismissed those claims as an abuse of process. The judgment states that the other claims were not affected and would proceed to a full merits hearing. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses as an abuse of process claims relating to detriments (a) to (d) in a case management order and/or Grievances 1 and 2 in the claimant's email. The extracted judgment does not identify the legal cause of action for those detriments or grievances, so the claim type is classified as other. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- abuse of process
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.