Case 2200435/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Pearcy (Managing Director) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200435/2024
- Decision date
- 16 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 28 June 2024 before Employment Judge Adkin sitting alone, the Respondent (represented by its Managing Director Mr P Pearcy) conceded all heads of claim except a claimed 25% ACAS uplift. The parties agreed an order in the terms recorded in the judgment.
The Tribunal found the following claims well founded and ordered the Respondent to pay, by 26 July 2024: £615.53 net for October 2023 salary (unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract); £354.57 gross for accrued untaken holiday pay (unlawful deduction from wages and under the Working Time Regulations 1998); and £2,708.33 gross for one month's pay in lieu of notice (breach of contract). The Respondent was also ordered to provide, by the same date, copies of all documentation it held in relation to the Claimant's Nest pension, including amounts paid and the Nest account number.
The claim for a 25% uplift for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures was stayed, to stand dismissed without further order unless either party applied by 28 September 2024 to lift the stay.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | October 2023 salary; £615.53 (net). Respondent conceded. Also pleaded as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £616 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued untaken holiday pay; £354.57 (gross). Pleaded under unlawful deduction from wages and the Working Time Regulations 1998. Respondent conceded. | Upheld | — | £355 |
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay claim was also brought under the Working Time Regulations 1998; award not separately apportioned (covered by the £354.57 holiday pay figure). | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | One month's payment in lieu of notice; £2,708.33 (gross). Respondent conceded. | Upheld | — | £2,708 |
| Other | Claim for a 25% uplift for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures was stayed, to stand dismissed without further order unless either party applied by 28 September 2024 to lift the stay. Outcome not finally determined on the face of this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,678
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.