Case 2200436/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Popa v Reply Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200436/2020
- Decision date
- 5 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Popa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short procedural decision. It records that Mr B Popa's claims against Reply Ltd were dismissed on withdrawal under rule 52, Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The decision does not identify the claims individually or make findings on the merits.
The same order vacated the preliminary hearing listed for 3 June 2020. No remedy, compensation, or liability findings were recorded in the judgment sent to the parties on 5 June 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the individual claims, but records that the Claimant's claims against Reply Ltd were dismissed on withdrawal under rule 52, Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No merits findings are recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52, Schedule 1 Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.