Case 2200437/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Day (First Claimant, representing all Claimants) v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200437/2021
- Decision date
- 6 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms G Carpenter, Mr D Clay
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms L Day (First Claimant, representing all Claimants)
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central on 4 to 6 May 2022 before Employment Judge Glennie with Ms G Carpenter and Mr D Clay as lay members, heard a claim brought by Miss L Day on behalf of 16 claimants against Gourmet Burger Kitchen (UK) Limited. The only substantive claim recorded in the written judgment was for a protective award under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The unanimous judgment dismissed the protective award claim. The written record does not set out detailed reasons, but it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing. The respondent’s application for a costs order was also dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Claim for a protective award pursuant to sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.