Case 2200440/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Enoch v La Cave a Fromage London Ltd and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200440/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms F Enoch
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 8 June 2020, Employment Judge A M Snelson, sitting in chambers, determined the case on the papers. The judgment records that the claims against the Second and Third Respondents were dismissed.
The tribunal found the Claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal well-founded and ordered the First Respondent to pay compensation of £1,765.85, described as four weeks' net pay. It also found the claim for compensation for annual leave entitlement outstanding on termination of employment well-founded and awarded £544.76, described as eight days' gross pay.
The tribunal further found the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered payment of £388.33, representing the net pay deducted. The judgment includes a note that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable on the annual leave award, and that appropriate deductions would discharge that part of the judgment if accounted for to the proper authorities. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £2,698.94.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as four weeks' net pay. | Upheld | — | £1,766 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as eight days' gross pay for annual leave entitlement outstanding on termination of employment; the judgment notes tax and national insurance may be payable on this component. | Upheld | — | £545 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as the net pay deducted. | Upheld | — | £388 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,699
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.