Case 2200444/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Rabarjoelina v La Cave a Fromage London Ltd and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200444/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr T Rabarjoelina
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 8 June 2020, sitting in chambers, Employment Judge A M Snelson determined the case on the papers. The judgment records that the First and Third Respondents failed to present a response to the claims. It also records that the claims against the Second and Third Respondents were dismissed.
Mr T Rabarjoelina succeeded on his complaint of wrongful dismissal. The tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay compensation representing four weeks' net pay, assessed at £1,449.23.
He also succeeded on his complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. The tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay £235.32, described as the net pay deducted. No other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held the complaint well-founded and ordered the First Respondent to pay compensation representing four weeks' net pay. The judgment also records that the claims against the Second and Third Respondents were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £1,449 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered the First Respondent to pay the net pay deducted. The judgment also records that the claims against the Second and Third Respondents were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £235 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,685
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.