Case 2200448/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Vettard v La Cave a Fromage London Ltd and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200448/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr F Vettard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in chambers on 8 June 2020 and decided the case on the documents in the file. It recorded that the first and third respondents had not presented a response to the claims. The tribunal dismissed the claims against the second and third respondents.
Against the first respondent, La Cave a Fromage London Ltd, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,570.22. It also found the complaint of wrongful dismissal well-founded and ordered compensation of £2,747.77, stated to represent seven weeks' net pay.
The tribunal further upheld the claim for compensation for annual leave entitlement outstanding on termination, awarding £363.31 for five days' gross pay, and upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages, awarding £227.11 for the net pay deducted. The judgment notes that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable on the annual leave award, subject to appropriate deductions and accounting by the respondents.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,570 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Award stated to represent seven weeks' net pay. | Upheld | — | £2,748 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated to represent five days' gross pay for annual leave entitlement outstanding on termination; the judgment notes tax and national insurance may be payable on this award. | Upheld | — | £363 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated to represent the net pay deducted. | Upheld | — | £227 |
| Other | The claims against the second and third respondents were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,908
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.