Case 2200449/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J. Sanderson v Mahiki Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200449/2022
- Decision date
- 28 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J. Sanderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge E Burns therefore determined the claim on the papers under Rule 21, after considering the ET1 and the additional information provided by the claimant. The listed hearing on 6 April 2022 was vacated.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment, his full entitlement to statutory notice, and a payment in lieu of accrued annual leave on termination. Annex A set out the calculation supplied by the claimant and adopted in the judgment.
The redundancy element was calculated at £2,753.50 based on weekly pay of £275.35 and 10 years' service. The holiday element was calculated at £2,450.62, using a daily rate of £55.07 for 44.5 days accrued leave. The notice element was calculated at £1,652.10 after reducing the full statutory notice entitlement of £2,753.50 to reflect four weeks' notice already given.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £6,856.22 in total and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on that amount.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 default judgment. Annex A says the statutory redundancy payment was calculated at £2,753.50 based on £275.35 per week and 10 years' service. | Upheld | — | £2,754 |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 default judgment. Annex A says the full statutory notice entitlement was £2,753.50, but this was reduced to £1,652.10 because four weeks' notice had already been given. | Upheld | — | £1,652 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 default judgment. Annex A says payment in lieu of accrued annual leave was calculated at £55.07 per day for 44.5 days, giving £2,450.62. | Upheld | — | £2,451 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,856
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.