Case 2200452/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Iacub v Fyre Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200452/2022
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Iacub
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Central London Employment Tribunals on 31 January 2022. The respondent, Fyre Group Limited, failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Brown decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. It does not set out the individual causes of action, findings on liability for each head of claim, or any remedy figure. The judgment also states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
This was a default judgment only. No legal test beyond rule 21 is named, and no panel members are listed in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 default judgment. The judgment states that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and that the claim succeeds, but it does not identify individual heads of claim or any remedy. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.