Case 2200469/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Theola Reid v Community Enrichment Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200469/2024
- Decision date
- 8 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grubb
- Venue
- Cardiff Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Theola Reid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cardiff Central Employment Tribunal by video on 19 April 2024 before Employment Judge Grubb sitting alone. The claimant, Ms Theola Reid, appeared in person and the respondent, Community Enrichment Trust, was represented by Ms Surrel Stewart, Director.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Ms Reid the gross sum of £300, identified in the judgment as the amount unlawfully deducted.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further findings are set out in the extracted written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £300 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.