Case 2200482/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Andrews v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200482/2022
- Decision date
- 16 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms S Coles, Mr A Greenwood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Andrews
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms T Andrews succeeded in part against the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis on disability discrimination claims. It held that the respondent discriminated against her contrary to section 15 Equality Act 2010 in relation to comments in an email of 20 May 2021, identified as complaint 11e, but not otherwise.
The tribunal also found indirect discrimination contrary to section 19 Equality Act 2010 by requiring the claimant to work in a communal room four days a week, complaint 15b, but not otherwise. The same factual requirement also gave rise to a failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010.
On the reasonable adjustments claim, the tribunal held that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments both by requiring the claimant to work in a communal room four days a week, complaint 15b, and by not permitting her husband to attend a meeting on 6 September 2021, complaint 21a, but not otherwise. The tribunal further found that the acts of discrimination extended over a period for the purposes of section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 and that all claims were within the statutory time limit. No remedy figure is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Equality Act 2010 s15 finding in respect of comments in an email dated 20 May 2021 (complaint 11e); dismissed otherwise. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Equality Act 2010 s19 finding that requiring the claimant to work in a communal room four days a week (complaint 15b) was indirect discrimination; dismissed otherwise. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Equality Act 2010 ss20 and 21 finding that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments by requiring the claimant to work in a communal room four days a week (complaint 15b) and by not permitting her husband to attend a meeting on 6 September 2021 (complaint 21a); dismissed otherwise. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s15 Equality Act 2010
- s19 Equality Act 2010
- ss20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- s123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.