Case 2200496/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v CG Elite Events Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200496/2020
- Decision date
- 14 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Nora Tinfou brought a claim against CG Elite Events Limited at London Central Employment Tribunal. The respondent failed to file an ET3 grounds of resistance, and Employment Judge Adkin decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
On the papers, the tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully deducted the claimant’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records no further dispute on liability and no separate findings on any other claim type.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,143.55. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal determined the claim without a hearing under rule 21 because the respondent did not file an ET3 grounds of resistance. | Upheld | — | £2,144 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,144
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.