Case 2200513/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A De v Vizio Silicon Roundabout Academy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200513/2022
- Decision date
- 14 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A De
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant’s claims lay only against Silicon Roundabout Academy Ltd. To the extent the claim form purported to bring claims against other parties, those claims were dismissed. No separate liability findings are recorded in the extract for those other parties.
The claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found well-founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,416.67 in respect of that claim.
The judgment records that the award is a gross figure. It also notes that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable on the award, and that the sum includes the amount properly payable in respect of pension contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the claim as a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £5,416.67. The judgment notes this is a gross figure and that tax, national insurance, and pension contributions may be relevant. | Upheld | — | £5,417 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,417
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.