Case 2200523/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Roger Morgan v Philip Hirschler — 2025
- Case reference
- 2200523/2025
- Decision date
- 26 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Burns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Roger Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 14 August 2025, Employment Judge J Burns stayed the proceedings and directed that they would be struck out without further order on 14 November 2025 unless, before then, the Claimant's Trustee in Bankruptcy applied in writing for her or her assignee to be joined as Claimant. The reasons record that the case was therefore contingent on a written application by the trustee or assignee before the specified date.
A letter dated 22 October 2025 from the Official Receiver confirmed that it would not be proceeding with the claim. In light of that confirmation, the condition in the earlier order was not met.
Accordingly, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the merits and no monetary award. The judgment is signed by Employment Judge Baty and sent to the parties on 26 November 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the reasons section; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out after the Trustee in Bankruptcy did not apply to be joined and the Official Receiver confirmed it would not be proceeding. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.