Case 2200551/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Risueno Navarro v Remi Makinde t/a The London Cat Sitting Company Heard at London Central (by CVP) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2200551/2025
- Decision date
- 18 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shukla
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Risueno Navarro
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for work done in December 2024 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted.
The tribunal also found that, when proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. It awarded an amount equal to two weeks' gross pay under section 38 Employment Act 2002 and declined to award four weeks' gross pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded and awards the gross sum deducted for work done in December 2024. | Upheld | — | £242 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £524
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.