Case 2200554/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr William Slivinsky, Lay consultant For the v No appearance or — 2026
- Case reference
- 2200554/2025
- Decision date
- 16 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coen
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr William Slivinsky, Lay consultant For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 because no response to the claim had been presented by the Respondent, Luxe Decorating Ltd. The hearing took place at London Central on 16 January 2026 before Employment Judge Coen sitting alone; the Claimant was represented by a lay consultant and the Respondent did not appear and was not represented.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant's claims succeeded. It ordered the Respondent to pay a gross sum of £1,438 (two weeks' pay applying the statutory cap) in respect of the failure to provide written particulars under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, a net sum of £2,050 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages between 22 July 2024 and 13 September 2024, and a net sum of £840 in respect of holiday pay for holiday accrued but not taken across the same period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Net sum awarded in respect of unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages between 22 July 2024 and 13 September 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,050 |
| Holiday pay | Net sum awarded for holiday accrued but not taken between 22 July 2024 and 13 September 2024. | Upheld | — | £840 |
| Other | Award pursuant to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for failure to provide written particulars; gross sum equal to two weeks' pay applying the statutory cap. No discrete §4.4 enum value covers a s.1 ERA written particulars award, so classified as 'other'. | Upheld | — | £1,438 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,328
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.