Case 2200568/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Plagiau-Sweetland v Verkada Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200568/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Plagiau-Sweetland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim before the tribunal was Mr A Plagiau-Sweetland’s complaint of unfair dismissal against Verkada Limited. The hearing took place at London Central via CVP on 5 June 2024 before Employment Judge Nicklin. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal complaint was presented out of time. It further found that it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to present the claim within the statutory time limit. On that basis, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint.
The claim was therefore dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any separate remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint was presented out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to present the claim within the time limit. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.