Case 2200571/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2200571/2019
- Decision date
- 9 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr T Robinson, Mr S Godecharle
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at London Central, sitting on 7 to 9 October 2019 before Employment Judge E Burns with Mr T Robinson and Mr S Godecharle, unanimously upheld the claimant’s claim of unlawful pregnancy discrimination contrary to section 18 of the Equality Act 2010. It also unanimously upheld the claimant’s claim of victimisation contrary to section 27 of the Equality Act 2010.
The judgment records injury to feelings awards of £3,500 for the pregnancy discrimination complaint and £500 for the victimisation complaint. The extracted text does not set out any further reasoning or additional remedies, so the material outcome recorded is the two upheld Equality Act claims and a total award of £4,000.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £3,500 |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.