Case 2200573/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Nicole Yadid v Evcia Assets Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200573/2024
- Decision date
- 8 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Appearances
- Venue
- in public
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs Nicole Yadid
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Adkin heard the case by CVP on 4 November 2024. Mr Doyle, a director of the First Respondent (Evcia Assets Limited), admitted that the Claimant was owed two months' pay and admitted the gross monthly salary figure of £4,166.67 set out in the Claimant's Schedule of Loss dated 13 June 2024. On that admitted basis, the tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period 9 November 2023 to 4 January 2024, and entered judgment for £8,333.34 (less income tax and national insurance), payable within 14 days.
The judge declined to make an unless order in relation to payment of the admitted sum or the remainder of the claim, noting that the Claimant may apply in the event judgment is not satisfied within 14 days. Outstanding matters remain for further determination: the claim against Mr Doyle personally, the Claimant's contention that she should be paid for a minimum of six months, an ACAS uplift pursuant to s.207A TULR(C)A 1992, and the calculation of holiday pay (which can be made once the period of employment is decided).
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded against the First Respondent (Evcia Assets Limited) for the period 9 November 2023 to 4 January 2024. Sum represents two months' gross pay at £4,166.67 per month, less deductions for income tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £8,333 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment addresses only the admitted two months' wages. Outstanding disputes remain regarding the claim against Mr Doyle personally and the Claimant's contention that she should be paid for a minimum of six months, plus an ACAS uplift under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992. These matters are not adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay calculation deferred; the tribunal noted it can be made once the period of employment is decided. Not adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,333
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.207A TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.