Case 2200617/2024 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms D Burke, Head of Employee Relations — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200617/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Ouchene brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Stonegate Group. At the London Central hearing on 26 April 2024, Employment Judge P Klimov, sitting alone, found the complaint well-founded because the respondent had not paid all wages due in January 2024.
The tribunal recorded that the unpaid amount had subsequently been paid. On that basis, although the deduction claim succeeded, the tribunal made no order under section 24(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded because the respondent did not pay all wages due in January 2024. The unpaid amount was subsequently paid, and the tribunal therefore made no order under section 24(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.24(1)(a) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.