Case 2200619/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. C. Allaker v London Digital Printing Ltd. — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200619/2022
- Decision date
- 22 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leonard-Johnston Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. C. Allaker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London Central by video on 22 April 2022, Employment Judge Leonard-Johnston heard Mr C. Allaker's claims against London Digital Printing Ltd, and the judgment amended the respondent's name to London Digital Print Ltd. The tribunal first recorded that, for the holiday pay and notice pay claims, it was not reasonably practicable for the claims to be presented within the normal time limit and that they were presented within a reasonable time thereafter.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 30 September 2021. On that basis, and pursuant to section 163(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, it held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,318.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was entitled to unpaid payment in lieu of notice of £3,318 gross and to payment for outstanding annual leave of £4,645 gross. The judgment then ordered the respondent to pay a total of £9,840, described as the unpaid balance after payments totalling £1,800.
The extracted text records both the gross entitlement figures and the final total award, but it does not set out the arithmetic used to move from the individual sums to the final £9,840 figure. The outcome is otherwise straightforward: the claimant succeeded on redundancy pay, notice pay, and holiday pay, and no discrimination or unfair dismissal claim is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 30 September 2021 and was entitled under section 163(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to a redundancy payment of £3,318. | Upheld | — | £3,318 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant succeeded on his unpaid payment in lieu of notice claim, which the tribunal valued at £3,318 gross. The judgment also records that, for the holiday pay and notice pay claims, it was not reasonably practicable to present the claims within the normal time limit and that they were presented within a reasonable time thereafter. | Upheld | — | £3,318 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to payment for outstanding annual leave of £4,645 gross. The judgment separately records a total award of £9,840 after payments totalling £1,800, but the extracted text does not show the arithmetic breakdown. | Upheld | — | £4,645 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,840
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 163(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- within a reasonable time thereafter
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.