Case 2200633/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Casten v Loitz Stiftung Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200633/2022
- Decision date
- 28 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Casten
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Casten appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The case was heard by Employment Judge Davidson at London Central on 22 September 2022, and the written judgment was dated 28 September 2022. The tribunal recorded a decision only on jurisdiction.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear Mr Casten's complaints of unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. No substantive findings on the merits of either complaint are recorded in the written decision.
The judgment states that written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is made within 14 days of the sending of the decision. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear this complaint. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear this complaint. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.