Case 2200637/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Rocchi v Octo Members Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200637/2022
- Decision date
- 24 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Employment Judge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Rocchi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a reserved preliminary issue on 17 April 2023 to decide whether Mr J Rocchi was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 for the period 7 September 2021 to 19 November 2021, before the disability discrimination and reasonable-adjustments claims proceeded to the final hearing. Octo Members Group Ltd accepted that he had sustained a brain injury after an accident on 29/30 June 2021, but disputed that the impairment had substantial long-term adverse effects on normal day-to-day activities.
The tribunal accepted that, during the material period, Mr Rocchi had lost his sense of taste and smell and continued to suffer headaches. It found those symptoms had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, including eating, enjoyment of food and drink, reading and screen use, and having to lie down during headaches. It did not accept that dizziness/disorientation or cognitive issues had been shown to the requisite standard during that period.
The tribunal found there was no medical evidence showing that the substantial adverse effects were long-term as at the date of the alleged discriminatory acts, and applied All Answers Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 606 in assessing the question by reference to the facts existing between 7 September 2021 and 19 November 2021. It therefore held that Mr Rocchi was not disabled within section 6 Equality Act 2010 and dismissed the disability discrimination claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue hearing on disability status; the disability discrimination and reasonable-adjustments claims were dismissed because the claimant was found not to be disabled within section 6 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1, Part 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Guidance on Definition of Disability (2011)
- All Answers Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 606
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.