Case 2200640/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No appearance or — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200640/2022
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coen
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim had been presented, and the Tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. Employment Judge Coen sat alone, and the Respondent did not appear or have representation.
The Tribunal found that it had jurisdiction to hear the Claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from wages, holiday accrued but not taken on termination, and a statutory redundancy payment. The claims succeeded following termination of the Claimant's employment on 19 July 2021.
The Respondent was ordered to pay gross sums of £1,142.00 for statutory redundancy pay, £2,019.23 for unauthorised deductions from wages between 27 June 2021 and 19 July 2021, and £2,975.00 for 22.1 days' accrued untaken holiday. The judgment noted that valid discharge could be made by paying the net sum after appropriate tax and national insurance deductions were accounted for.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The award was stated as a gross sum for statutory redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £1,142 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The award was stated as a gross sum for unauthorised deductions from wages between 27 June 2021 and 19 July 2021. | Upheld | — | £2,019 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The award was stated as a gross sum for 22.1 days' holiday accrued but not taken on termination. | Upheld | — | £2,975 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,136
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- section 111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 164(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.