Case 2200684/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Saba Wakil Khan v Education Dreams Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200684/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Saba Wakil Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not file an ET3 or Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Joffe therefore determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing, and vacated the listed hearing on 16 March 2023.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to Mrs Saba Wakil Khan in the sum of £720. It ordered Education Dreams Ltd to pay £720.00 and to account to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due on that sum.
No other claim, legal test, or separate remedy component is identified in the judgment text beyond the wages award. The decision is dated 14 March 2023 and was sent to the parties on 15 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages in the sum of £720 and ordered that sum to be paid. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £720
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.