Case 2200717/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Balcikoniene v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2200717/2019
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Balcikoniene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages after the respondent withheld Company Sick Pay during sickness absence from 2 October to 24 December 2018. The respondent accepted that its Attendance Policy gave eligible employees a contractual right to Company Sick Pay, but said it had lawfully exercised discretion to withhold it.
The tribunal found that the claimant was eligible for Company Sick Pay. She had followed the absence reporting procedure, provided fit notes, and maintained the regular or agreed contact required by the policy. The tribunal also found that the respondent had not established either of the grounds it relied on for withholding Company Sick Pay: the claimant had not failed to comply with the policy steps, and she was not absent immediately after a request to attend a disciplinary meeting.
The tribunal concluded that the Company Sick Pay was properly payable and that withholding it amounted to a series of unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent was ordered to pay £3,263.04, plus £7.00 in travel expenses under rule 75(1)(c).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for withheld Company Sick Pay. A separate £7 travel expenses reimbursement was ordered under rule 75(1)(c), but it was not part of the wages award. | Upheld | — | £3,263 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,263
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.