Case 2200723/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Birkin Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200723/2024
- Decision date
- 29 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Under Rule 21, the Employment Judge decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing on the basis of the ET1 and entered judgment for the claimant.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. It accepted the figures set out in the judgment for July 2023: the July payment due was £601.17 gross for 44 hours at £10.42 and 11 overtime hours at £13.02, while the claimant had been paid £544.31 gross, leaving £56.86 outstanding.
The tribunal also awarded holiday pay for 12 days in the sum of £333.44. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £390.30 gross in total, to be paid subject to deductions for tax and national insurance for which the respondent should account to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Outstanding pay for July 2023. The judgment states the July payment due was £601.17 gross for 44 hours at £10.42 and 11 hours overtime at £13.02, and that the claimant was paid £544.31 gross, leaving £56.86 unpaid. | Upheld | — | £57 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for 12 days was awarded in the amount of £333.44. | Upheld | — | £333 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £390
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.