Case 2200728/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Berry v Panzo Pizza Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200728/2023
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Berry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Panzo Pizza Ltd, did not present a response to the claim. The tribunal noted that the claim had been served by post and that it had also tried separately to contact the respondent using an email address provided by the claimant at the tribunal’s request.
Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, the claimant’s complaint of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal made an award of £6,173 net, payable by the respondent to the claimant, in respect of outstanding unpaid wages.
The hearing listed for 18 April 2023 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal recorded that no response to the claim was presented despite service by post and an attempted email contact with the respondent. | Upheld | — | £6,173 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,173
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.