Case 2200741/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Santos Tarrio v Transport UK East Midlands Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200741/2024
- Decision date
- 30 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Annand Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Santos Tarrio
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Santos Tarrio brought a single claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against Transport UK East Midlands Limited. The tribunal recorded that the parties agreed he had been correctly paid up to his termination date of 1 September 2023, and the dispute was whether he was entitled to the later negotiated 2022 pay award and the associated back pay after he had left employment on ill-health grounds.
The tribunal found that on 4 December 2023 the respondent, RMT and TSSA agreed a 2022 pay award of 5% or £1,750, whichever was greater, backdated to 1 April 2022, but the agreement expressly applied only to employees "who are in EMR’s employment at 30 November 2023." Because the claimant was not employed on that date, the express wording excluded him from the award.
The claimant relied on previous instances where leavers had apparently been paid backdated pay, but the tribunal held that the evidence fell far short of showing a sufficiently established, well known and clear custom or practice to imply a term requiring payment to leavers. In any event, the tribunal held that express terms take precedence over implied terms and that the express wording of the agreement excluded leavers.
Applying section 13 ERA 1996 and the authorities cited on whether wages were "properly payable", the tribunal concluded that the backdated pay claimed by Mr Tarrio was not wages properly payable to him. The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was therefore dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the 4 December 2023 pay award did not apply to the claimant because the agreement limited it to employees in employment at 30 November 2023, and he had left on 1 September 2023. It also found the evidence insufficient to establish an implied term by custom and practice that leavers would receive backdated pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.13(1) ERA 1996
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- Agarwal v Cardiff University and anor [2019] ICR 433
- Camden Primary Care Trust v Atchoe [2007] EWCA Civ 714
- Sagar v H Ridehalgh and Son Ltd [1931] 1 Ch 310
- Devonald v Rosser and Sons [1906] 2 KB 728
- Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] ICR 480
- St Budeaux Royal British Legion Club Ltd v Cropper EAT 39/94
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.