Case 2200754/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Simon Lovett v Felix Rosenstiel’s Widow and Son Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200754/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Simon Lovett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSimon Lovett brought unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims against Felix Rosenstiel’s Widow and Son Limited. The case was heard at Central London Employment Tribunal on 12 to 18 May 2022 before Employment Judge G. King. The tribunal held that both the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims were well founded and succeeded.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £2,421.00 and a compensatory award of £8,316.82. It then applied a 10% increase to both awards because of the respondent’s non-compliance with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, producing a total sum of £11,811.60.
The tribunal refused the claimant’s application for a costs order. Written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing unless a request for written reasons was made within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found this claim well founded and awarded a basic award and compensatory award, but the judgment does not apportion the monetary figures between the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims; both awards were then increased by 10% for non-compliance with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found this claim well founded and awarded a basic award and compensatory award, but the judgment does not apportion the monetary figures between the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims; both awards were then increased by 10% for non-compliance with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,812
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,421
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,317
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.