Case 2200776/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Clowes & Mrs B Burke v Grange Pre-School Playgroup At: Central London Employment Tribunal on 3 May 2024 — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200776/2024
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Clowes & Mrs B Burke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a short hearing before Employment Judge Nicolle by CVP on 3 May 2024, the Respondent, an unincorporated charity represented by three trustees, acknowledged that the two Claimants had been made redundant and were entitled to statutory redundancy payments. The Respondent had been unable to make those payments due to its insolvency. As the dismissals on the grounds of redundancy were not disputed, the Tribunal issued judgment on the Claimants' entitlement to statutory redundancy payments; no other sums were claimed.
Ms Clowes was employed from 16 September 2014 until 2 January 2024 with a weekly pay of £451.97, and was found entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £4,067.73 (9 x 1 x £370.85). Mrs Burke was employed from 6 September 2006 until 23 January 2024 with a weekly pay of £625, and was found entitled to a total statutory redundancy payment of £14,375, comprising £5,000 (8 x 1 x £625) and £9,375 (10 x 1.5 x £625).
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment for Ms D Clowes (employed 16 September 2014 to 2 January 2024; weekly pay £451.97; calculated as 9 x 1 x £370.85). | Upheld | — | £4,068 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment for Mrs B Burke (employed 6 September 2006 to 23 January 2024; weekly pay £625; calculated as (8 x 1 x £625) + (10 x 1.5 x £625) = £5,000 + £9,375). | Upheld | — | £14,375 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,443
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.