Case 2200792/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr M Mwangi First v D Monitoring UK Limited Fourth Respondent: Mr P Salah Seventh Respondent: Ms B Vassy — 2021

Case reference: 2200792/2021
Decision date: 24 November 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Wisby Appearances
Venue: London Central via CVP

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Mwangi First

Respondent

D Monitoring UK Limited Fourth Respondent: Mr P Salah Seventh Respondent: Ms B Vassy

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a case management decision heard at London Central via CVP on 24 November 2021 before Employment Judge Wisby. The claimant, Mr M Mwangi First, appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Ms Amartey of counsel.

The only determination recorded in the extracted judgment is that the respondents' application for strike out failed and was not granted. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.

No substantive claims, liability findings, or remedy awards are set out in the extracted text. On the material provided, the judgment resolves only the strike out application and does not record any financial award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The respondents' application for strike out failed and was not granted. The extracted judgment records only this procedural application; it does not record any substantive claim outcome.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.