Case 2200809/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Mr Muhammad Yaqub v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis — 2024

Case reference: 2200809/2024
Decision date: 31 December 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Gidney
Venue: London Central

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Muhammad Yaqub

Respondent

The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a procedural judgment. The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his Claim Form dated 12 August 2024.

The tribunal granted the respondent's application to strike out allegation 3.2.3 from the List of Issues. It refused the respondent's application to strike out and/or seek a deposit order for allegations 3.2.10, 3.2.11 and 3.2.12, which were relied on as both direct race discrimination and direct sex discrimination.

The tribunal directed that a case management hearing take place on 20 November 2024 to set directions for the final hearing of the three remaining factual allegations. The judgment did not determine the merits of those remaining allegations or make any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The judgment records that the respondent's strike out and/or deposit order application was refused in respect of three remaining factual allegations relied on as direct race discrimination. The merits of the discrimination claim were not determined in this judgment.	Other	Race	—
Sex discrimination	The judgment records that the respondent's strike out and/or deposit order application was refused in respect of three remaining factual allegations relied on as direct sex discrimination. The merits of the discrimination claim were not determined in this judgment.	Other	Sex	—
Other	The respondent's application to strike out allegation 3.2.3 of the List of Issues was granted, but the extracted judgment does not identify the legal basis of that allegation.	Struck out	—	—
Other	The claimant's application to amend his Claim Form dated 12 August 2024 was refused. The extracted judgment does not identify the proposed amendment's legal basis.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.