Case 2200822/2019 · Employment Tribunal
MR J HYNEK v Veolia ES (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200822/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms P Slattery, Mr F Benson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR J HYNEK
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at London Central on 23 September 2020 before Employment Judge M Emery with members Ms P Slattery and Mr F Benson. The claimant did not attend, and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The written judgment records the outcomes only. The claims of constructive unfair dismissal, automatic unfair dismissal on health and safety grounds, health and safety detriment, failure to make reasonable adjustments, unlawful victimisation, and direct race discrimination all failed and were dismissed.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the relevant period. No remedy or monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim of automatic unfair dismissal on health and safety grounds failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records that the claim of health and safety detriment failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the claim of unlawful victimisation failed and was dismissed; the specific protected act or characteristic is not stated in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claim of direct race discrimination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.