Case 2200839/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Represented himself v Mr Nikolay Dinev (Director) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200839/2023
- Decision date
- 27 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heydon Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Represented himself
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Kaloyan Georgiev, brought a complaint against NDD Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages. The case was heard at London Central on 27 March 2023 before Employment Judge Heydon, with the claimant representing himself and Mr Nikolay Dinev appearing for the respondent as director.
The tribunal found that the complaint was not well-founded and therefore not upheld. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any split of remedy, and the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded and therefore not upheld. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.