Case 2200849/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Stoeva 1st v GNC 2nd Respondent: A3D2 Limited 3rd Respondent: Keto Restaurant Limited 4th Respondent: Kerb Seven Dials Market Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200849/2023
- Decision date
- 3 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Stoeva 1st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at London Central on 3 May 2023 before Tribunal Judge J E Plowright sitting as an Employment Judge. The written judgment amends the names of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents to A3D2 Limited, Keto Restaurant Limited and Kerb Seven Dials Market Limited respectively.
The operative part of the judgment records that the claim against the 1st respondent, GNC, was dismissed, and that the claims against the 2nd respondent, A3D2 Limited, and the 3rd respondent, Keto Restaurant Limited, were also dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent. The extracted text does not set out the substantive heads of claim or any detailed findings of fact or law beyond the dismissals and respondent-name amendments.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment dismisses the claim against the 1st respondent, GNC. It does not identify the substantive head of claim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The written judgment dismisses the claim against the 2nd respondent, A3D2 Limited, and amends that respondent's name to A3D2 Limited. It does not identify the substantive head of claim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The written judgment dismisses the claim against the 3rd respondent, Keto Restaurant Limited, and amends that respondent's name to Keto Restaurant Limited. It does not identify the substantive head of claim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.