Case 2200857/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Flash React — 2019
- Case reference
- 2200857/2019
- Decision date
- 9 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because the respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Nicolle decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing on the basis of the ET1 and the judgment was made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant, Mr Jordan Watkins. The judgment records a single monetary order: the respondent was ordered to pay unpaid wages of £3,427 gross.
No additional findings, liability issues, or separate heads of remedy are recorded in the extracted text. The judgment does not specify any split between components of the award, only the gross amount ordered to be paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not file an ET3. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and ordered payment of £3,427 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,427 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,427
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,427
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.