Case 2200891/2024 · Employment Tribunal
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Ms G Norris v Modulous (Lewisham) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2200891/2024
- Decision date
- 1 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Ms G Norris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Glennie made a partial rule 22 judgment after the respondent failed to file a response. The respondent's name was amended to Modulous (Lewisham) Limited.
The complaints of unlawful deduction from wages (one month's salary of £3,862 and unpaid pension contributions of £1,545.04, totalling £5,407.04), failure to pay notice pay (£3,862) and failure to pay holiday pay (7 days at £177.56, totalling £1,242.94) were all well-founded. All figures are calculated gross and may be subject to tax and National Insurance.
The remaining complaints of unfair dismissal, a redundancy payment and a protective award were reserved for determination at a separate hearing.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | One month's salary £3,862 plus unpaid pension contributions £1,545.04. | Upheld | — | £5,407 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay notice pay (one month's salary). | Upheld | — | £3,862 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday pay (7 days at £177.56). | Upheld | — | £1,243 |
| Unfair dismissal | Reserved to a separate hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Redundancy | Reserved to a separate hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Protective award reserved to a separate hearing. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,512
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.