Case 2200893/2021 · Employment Tribunal
N Wood v Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200893/2021
- Decision date
- 7 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Employment Judge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a security officer at the National Gallery, was summarily dismissed after the respondent concluded she attended work on 18 September 2020 with Covid-19 symptoms. The tribunal found that the investigation, including interviews with the claimant and colleagues who had been in contact with her, was reasonable. It also found that any omission in not interviewing two named witnesses during the investigation was rectified during the disciplinary process.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal held that the respondent had formed a genuine belief, on reasonable grounds, that the claimant attended work with a cough and was aware of symptoms from the night before. It accepted that the respondent considered the claimant's length of service and clean disciplinary record, but found that dismissal fell within the reasonable range of responses given the pandemic context and health and safety risks.
For wrongful dismissal, the tribunal assessed what had actually happened on the balance of probabilities. It found the claimant was not a credible witness on the relevant factual issues and concluded that she had attended work with mild Covid-19 symptoms, breaching the respondent's health and safety procedures and the duty of trust and confidence. Both claims were dismissed, and no remedy hearing was required.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the respondent carried out a reasonable investigation, held a genuine belief in misconduct, and that summary dismissal was within the reasonable range of responses. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the claimant attended work with some Covid-19 symptoms, breaching health and safety procedures and trust and confidence, so summary dismissal was not wrongful. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Vaughan v Modality Partnership UKEAT/0147/20
- BHS v Burchell
- Polkey principle
- sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rawson v Robert Norman Associates Ltd UKEAT/0199/13
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.