Case 2200921/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200921/2021
- Decision date
- 3 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr F Benson, Ms C Brayson
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that the unanimous judgment of the tribunal was that all of the complaints were dismissed. The case was heard at London Central before Employment Judge Glennie, sitting with Mr F Benson and Ms C Brayson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms O Dobbie of counsel.
No detailed reasons are set out in the written record because the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. The document also states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The written judgment records that all complaints were dismissed; the specific complaint types are taken from the published case listing categories for this case. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Redundancy | The written judgment records that all complaints were dismissed; the specific complaint types are taken from the published case listing categories for this case. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that all complaints were dismissed; the specific complaint types are taken from the published case listing categories for this case. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.