Case 2200986/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Horkan v British United Provident Association Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200986/2021
- Decision date
- 23 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Horkan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 25 January 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr W Horkan an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 5 October 2021. The Tribunal recorded that he did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The judgment states that the claimant had been aware of the respondent's application for an unless order since 17 December 2021, and of a further application dated 17 January 2022. Because no sufficient response had been received, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearings listed for 23 February 2022 were vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action. The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 5 October 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.