Case 2200993/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Miah v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200993/2022
- Decision date
- 24 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Miah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by London Ambulance Service NHS Trust as Emergency Ambulance Crew on a part-time annualised hours arrangement. He claimed unlawful deductions from wages in relation to unsocial hours pay for 30 May 2021 to 28 August 2021 and disruption payments for shifts worked on 25, 26 and 27 December 2021.
On unsocial hours pay, the tribunal found that the relevant contractual and policy documents required calculation over a 13-week reference period, but did not support calculating the claimant's entitlement by reference to what the respondent said he should have worked in that period. On a plain reading, unsocial hours were to be calculated as a proportion of the hours actually worked. Because more than 56% of the claimant's actual hours in the relevant period were unsocial, he was entitled to the 25% enhancement, and the agreed deduction of £473.93 was unlawful.
On disruption payments, the tribunal found that the Christmas bulletin, read as a whole, applied disruption payments to overtime shifts only, including core rota shifts worked as overtime. The claimant had asked for the relevant December shifts to be recorded as core shifts before payment was processed, and they were paid as standard hours. He was therefore not entitled to disruption payments, and that part of the unlawful deductions claim did not succeed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unsocial hours payment claim for the period 30 May 2021 to 28 August 2021 succeeded. The parties agreed the deduction was £473.93 if the claimant was entitled to the 25% rate. | Upheld | — | £474 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Christmas 2021 disruption payment claim dismissed. The tribunal found disruption payments were only payable for specified shifts worked as overtime, and the claimant had elected to record the shifts as core, non-overtime shifts. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £474
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.