Case 2201008/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Junhai Feng v New Zonyi Ltd t/a Kirin Restaurant — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201008/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elliott Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Junhai Feng
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Junhai Feng worked for New Zonyi Ltd t/a Kirin Restaurant from 30 September 2019 to 18 October 2019 and was paid £450 in cash in total. He brought claims for unlawful deductions from wages and holiday pay. The tribunal also dealt with the respondent’s attempt to raise a boiler-repair deduction, but held there was no valid counterclaim in these proceedings because the claimant had not brought a breach of contract claim within the tribunal’s jurisdiction under the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994.
On the wage claim, the tribunal found that there was no written contract, no payslip, and no time records. It preferred the claimant’s evidence on the hours worked because the respondent’s witness had no first-hand knowledge of the kitchen working arrangements and the Head Chef, Mr Li, was not called. The tribunal found that the claimant worked 52 hours in the week commencing 30 September 2019 and 34 hours in the week commencing 14 October 2019, giving 86 unpaid hours in total. Applying the National Minimum Wage rate of £8.21 per hour, it awarded £706.06 for unlawful deductions from wages.
The tribunal rejected any offset for the boiler repair. It found no written agreement authorising deductions from wages within section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and it made no finding as to the cause of the boiler breakdown. The invoice for £984 did not change that position, and the tribunal said the respondent could pursue any such claim elsewhere if it wished.
For holiday pay, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had taken no annual leave during his short employment. Applying regulations 13, 13A and 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, it awarded one day’s holiday pay of £82.10. The total gross award was therefore £788.16.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant for 86 hours at £8.21 per hour. The respondent’s suggested deduction for the boiler repair was not allowed: there was no valid employer counterclaim in these proceedings, and the alleged agreement to deduct was not recorded in writing as required by s.13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £706 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had taken no annual leave during his employment and awarded one day’s holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998, calculated at £82.10. | Upheld | — | £82 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £788
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulations 13, 13A and 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Article 4 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.