Case 2201028/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Research Centre London Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201028/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Adkin therefore decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully deducted the claimant’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records no further factual findings beyond the basis for the rule 21 determination.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £11,666.67, described as net of deductions for income tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal determined the claim without a hearing under rule 21 and found an unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £11,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,667
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- rule 21 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.