Case 2201060/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr A Williams, Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201060/2021
- Decision date
- 11 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elliott Date
- Panel members
- Mr P Madelin, Mr I Allwright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Lamond's claims against Bag and Bones Ltd were heard at London Central on 9, 10 and 11 May 2022 before Employment Judge Elliott sitting with Mr P Madelin and Mr I Allwright. The tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the claims failed and were dismissed.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent. No request was made at the hearing, and the extract records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record of this short-form judgment records only that the claims were unanimously dismissed; it does not set out separate reasons for each claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The written record of this short-form judgment records only that the claims were unanimously dismissed; it does not set out separate reasons for each claim. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.