Case 2201073/2021 · Employment Tribunal
MRS A. P. VERONA v Qatar Airways Group Qcsc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2201073/2021
- Decision date
- 17 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MRS A. P. VERONA
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote hearing before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone. The tribunal refused the respondent's applications to strike out the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, and disability discrimination, and also refused the respondent's application for a deposit order in relation to those complaints. The judgment does not determine the merits of those claims; it only records that the applications to remove them at this stage were not granted.
The tribunal found that the claimant's continuous service with the respondent began on 17 April 2019. It identified the material date under s.97(3) ERA 1996 as 9 April 2021 and held that the effective date of termination, and relevant date, was 16 April 2021 under s.97(2) and s.86(1)(a) ERA 1996. On that basis, the claimant had been continuously employed for at least two years ending with the effective date of termination for the purposes of s.108(1) and s.155 ERA 1996.
The claimant's notice pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal also rejected the claimant's first claim, case number 2201073/2021, under Rule 12(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claim form stated that an early conciliation exemption applied when it did not. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent's strike-out and deposit order applications in respect of this complaint were refused; the judgment does not determine the merits of the claim. | Other | — | — |
| Redundancy | The respondent's strike-out and deposit order applications in respect of this complaint were refused; the judgment does not determine the merits of the claim. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The respondent's strike-out and deposit order applications in respect of this complaint were refused; the judgment does not determine the merits of the claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Other | The claimant's notice pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The first claim, case number 2201073/2021, was rejected under Rule 12(1)(d) because the claim form confirmed an early conciliation exemption that did not apply. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Rule 37(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 12(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.97(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.97(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.86(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.145(5) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.