Case 2201077/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Apex Build Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2201077/2020
- Decision date
- 12 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not file an ET3 grounds of resistance. Employment Judge Adkin decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing on the basis of the ET1.
The tribunal held that the respondent failed to pay the claimant a redundancy payment, failed to pay notice pay in breach of contract, and failed to pay holiday pay. Those were the only substantive findings recorded in the judgment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,660.00 for unpaid holiday pay, £6,037.50 for redundancy pay, and £5,500.00 for notice pay. The judgment states that the sums were to be paid net of tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as unpaid holiday pay, payable net of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,660 |
| Redundancy | Awarded as redundancy pay, payable net of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £6,038 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as notice pay for breach of contract, payable net of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £5,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,198
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.