Case 2201099/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Dee v First Great Western Railway Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2201099/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Stout Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Dee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Stout vacated the case management preliminary hearing listed for 17 January 2022 after the claimant did not respond to the Regional Employment Judge's order of 21 September 2021 requiring him to confirm whether claim 1403399/2020 was being pursued, or to the respondent's application of 22 October 2021 seeking strike-out of that claim. Although those communications did not specifically relate to claim 2201099/2020, the tribunal treated the two claims as substantively the same and considered that a claimant who wished to pursue either would reasonably have responded.
By order of 12 January 2022 the claimant was directed to respond by 26 January 2022 to confirm whether he wished to pursue the claims and, if not, to withdraw them, with a warning that non-response was likely to lead to strike-out without a hearing. The claimant did not respond, and the whole of the claimant's claims were struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 as not actively pursued. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim 2201099/2020; the whole of the claimant's claims were struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Linked case 1403399/2020; the whole of the claimant's claims were struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.